Wednesday, 27 March 2013

{Political_Views} Aspartame



The dairy lobby is pressuring the FDA to get permission to put aspartame in our milk without a label.

Can you chip in $3 to help us blanket the FDA's zip code with ads during the public comment period for the next month?

Please donate

Friend,

Lobbyists for mega-corporations are hell-bent on redefining one of the few foods that is still safe for our kids -- milk. For three years, the uber-powerful dairy lobby has pressured the FDA to approve the artificial sweetener aspartame as an additive to milk without a label.

Now, for the first time in three years, the FDA's public comment period for the proposal has finally begun. To make public opinion absolutely clear, we're going to:

  1. Blanket the FDA headquarters' zip-code with ads targeted at employees, and 
  2. Send people dressed as cows to the entrance of FDA headquarters to hand out milk and ask employees the simple question: Do you want Aspartame with that?

Can you chip in $3, or whatever you can afford, to help us get FDA employees to stand up to dairy lobbyists and stop them from putting aspartame in milk unlabeled? With $3, we can hand out milk and information to 5 FDA employees.

In just the last week, over 100,000 SumOfUs.org members signed our petition telling the FDA not to buckle under the dairy industry's pressure. But if we want to compete with the lobbyists, we're going to have to make sure that FDA employees hear about our petition and know that we'll stand with them if they stand up to the dairy industry.

If all according goes to plan, FDA employees will arrive at work one day and see people dressed as cows standing at the FDA entrance. As they approach, wondering what in the world is going on, a cow will offer them milk. When they roll down their window, we'll ask them the simple question: Do you want aspartame with that?

For employees who drive to work, we're going to buy targeted radio ads that they'll hear on their commute. For those that take the bus, we'll place ads on the sides of the buses that stop right outside FDA. And when they're sitting at their computers, they're going to see our ads when they're browsing Facebook and using Google.

We're going to make sure that the dairy lobby's efforts to get aspartame in milk is the topic of thousands of water cooler conversations in the weeks to come. The quiet agreement the dairy industry had hoped for isn't going to happen this time around.

Help us make this a reality, by chipping in just $3 you can send people dressed as cows to FDA headquarters to stop them from putting aspartame in unlabeled milk.

This proposal to redefine milk to include aspartame is particularly worrisome, and dangerous, for kids. Aspartame, which was originally marketed by Monsanto in the 80s and 90s, has been linked to increased rates of Type 2 diabetes and obesity. Hyper-sweet additives like aspartame have been proven to rewire children's brains so that they constantly crave sugary foods. According to a 60 Minutes report, "aspartame's approval was one of the most contested in FDA history." The FDA's own toxicologist told Congress that the chemical is likely to cause brain tumors.

If the FDA decides in May to allow this proposal to go through, then pretty soon kids won't be able to tell without carefully reading the fine print -- and, let's be real, what kid carefully reads any fine print -- if the "milk" they're picking up in school cafeterias is real milk or Diet Milk, chock-full of chemical sweeteners.

This is our one shot to stop this dangerous proposal. Can you help make it count by chipping in $3 or more to show FDA employees that they need to stop this proposal?

SumOfUs.org exists to counter corporate lobbyists whose only interest is advancing profits. Before we got on the case, this issue was relegated to most marginal of websites. Little attention had been paid by mainstream media. Now outlets like NPR and the Huffington Post are telling the story of how the dairy industry wants to put our kids' health at risk to sell more super-sweet beverages to our kids. We've already changed the conversation, but if we can just get the folks who work at the FDA -- scientists, public health officials and the like -- to take notice, then we can stop this threat to our kids' health once and for all.

Thank you for standing up for against corporate lobbyists,

- Claiborne, Kaytee and the rest of us


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Political_Views" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to political_views+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

{Political_Views} Dear Mr. President: Don't Screw This Up




free press action fund

Dear James,

Big news: Julius Genachowski is history.

The Federal Communications Commission chairman is stepping down — and we need to seize the moment to push for a chair who won't cater to corporate interests. 

Genachowski claimed broadband was his agency's top priority, but stood by as prices rose and competition dwindled. He claimed to be a staunch defender of the open Internet, but his Net Neutrality rules are full of loopholes. When we needed someone to stand up to the phone and cable companies, Genachowski almost always caved.

Worse still, he signed off on the destructive Comcast-NBC merger. And he pushed the Bush administration's failed media ownership policies in spite of overwhelming public opposition. We can't afford another FCC chair who's on Rupert Murdoch's side instead of yours.

Tell the President: Pick an FCC Chair Who Will Fight for the Public

President Obama is expected to announce his pick for Genachowski's successor soon. We need someone who will: 

Protect Net Neutrality. The next FCC chair will face the fallout from a major court decision on the FCC's Open Internet rules. Whatever the ruling, the FCC chair must make protecting Internet users the top priority. 

Promote Broadband Competition. We need more choices for high-speed Internet service. The FCC has the power to block mergers, foster innovation and free up more of the public airwaves. The chair shouldn't let AT&T and its pals kill off the few consumer protections we have left.

Free Our Phones. The White House recently urged Congress and the FCC to legalize cellphone unlocking. The next chair should stand up for our right to use our devices anywhere and any way we choose.

Create Real Media Diversity. As our nation becomes increasingly diverse, we need a media system that reflects this reality. The FCC is the only agency with a mandate to make our media more diverse, local and accountable. 

Expose the Dirty Money. The FCC must use its power to demand transparency from political advertisers and local broadcasters. It should require the funders of attack ads to put their names in the actual ads.

Tell President Obama: We Need an FCC Chair Who's on Our Side

We need the next chair to understand that the public interest comes first.

We need someone who'll stand up for the rest of us.

Onward,

Craig Aaron
Free Press Action Fund

P.S. No matter who leads the FCC, the agency needs to put people first every step of the way. Help us stay vigilant by making a $5 monthly donation to the Free Press Action Fund. Thank you.

The Free Press Action Fund is a nonpartisan organization building a nationwide movement for media that serve the public interest. The Free Press Action Fund does not support or oppose any candidate for public office. Learn more at www.freepress.net.

Join us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Political_Views" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to political_views+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

{Political_Views} Un-freaking-believable





Friend

It's unbelievable: The whole Internet is clamoring for reform of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act becaue it stifles innovation and even imprisons activists and innovators like Aaron Swartz. (And could easily have been used against Steve Jobs, Mark Zuckerberg, and countless others.)

So what are some Republicans in the House thinking about doing? Expanding it, and instituting even harsher penalties.

This is completely unacceptable.

Click here to tell your lawmakers to oppose harsher CFAA penalties.

The new law would heighten penalties -- creating the possibility of up to 30 years in prison for a single broadly-defined offense -- make it easy to be considered a conspirator, and entrench law enforcement's assertions that they should be able to put you in prison for violating terms of serivce agreements!

This is an awful affront to all of the work we've been doing and to the cries for justice in the wake of Aaron's passing. Please help us beat this thing down!

Just click here to email your lawmakers.

[fb] If you're already on Facebookclick here to share with your friends.
[fb] If you're already on Twitter, click here to tweet about the campaign: Tweet

Thanks.

Demand Progress

Paid for by Demand Progress (DemandProgress.org) and not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. Contributions are not deductible as charitable contributions for federal income tax purposes.

One last thing -- Demand Progress's small, dedicated, under-paid staff relies on the generosity of members like you to support our work. Will you click here to chip in $5 or $10? Or you can become a Demand Progress monthly sustainer by clicking here. Thank you!

 

http://act.demandprogress.org/cms/unsubscribe/unsubscribe/?akid=2067.2080900.afi091

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Political_Views" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to political_views+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

{Political_Views} Friend, are you getting text message spam?


Dear James:

I've recently received a few random text messages that looked like junk email, offering me exclusive deals or free giveaways. Apparently, I'm not the only one receiving these unsolicited text messages. In fact, the Federal Trade Commission recently announced a crackdown on senders of spam text messages and charged eight defendants with collectively sending over 180 million messages promising 'free' gift cards and prizes. That's right. Millions of people are receiving these spam texts, too.

We hope that the FTC's action will send a clear message to scammers and help protect wireless consumers like you and me. While the FTC and the wireless service providers continue their fight to eliminate junk and unwanted text messages, we here at MyWireless.org want to make sure you have all the information you need to identify and stop text message spam:

What is text message spam?

Spam text messages are unsolicited or unwanted commercial advertisements sent via SMS to large groups of cellphone users. These messages often try to trick you into divulging personal data such as your contact information or financial details.

What should I do if I receive text message spam?

When you receive text spam, forward the message to short code SPAM (7726) from your wireless device. This free reporting service is operated on behalf of the GSMA, a consortium of international phone providers. With your help, security companies and carriers can analyze the information and stop future spam messages.

What if I am charged for receiving text message spam?

If you think you have been charged for receiving text message spam, make sure you forward the message to 7726 as soon as possible and contact your wireless carrier. They can investigate the messages and help resolve any billing questions you have.

What about opt-in text messages?

If you signed up for text messages from a subscription service and you no longer wish to receive them, you can simply reply to the text message with 'STOP'. This will unsubscribe you from the service.

What can I do to spread the word?

Let your family and friends know about text message spam. The more awareness we can generate about this deceitful marketing practice, the sooner we can pull the plug on text message spam. 

Sincerely,

Amy McLean

Director, Advocacy Communications

MyWireless.org


Stay Connected with MyWireless
facebook twitter youtube mywireless.org

About MyWireless.org®
MyWireless.org® is a national non-profit consumer advocacy organization giving hundreds of millions of American wireless consumers a powerful and unified voice to protect the freedom, value, convenience, security and mobility they enjoy with wireless service. Since 2005, we've helped defeat more than $1 billion worth of unfair wireless taxes, fees and regulations, and we need your help to continue the fight. For more information, visit www.mywireless.org.

 



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Political_Views" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to political_views+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

{Political_Views} You can be damned sure this isn't going to stop:




Organizing for Action
 Friend --

I want to make one thing absolutely clear:

We're up against a whole lot more than just opposition in Congress.

We're up against interest groups with money to burn -- organizations willing to drop every last penny they have to stop President Obama's agenda in its tracks. We're already seeing it on gun violence, and immigration reform -- they're going to spend millions to throw a wrench in the works of progress.

You can be damned sure that this is not going to stop.

Organizing for Action is going to shift the balance of power in Washington back to real people. People like you have shown over and over again that no amount of spending can stop millions of Americans calling for change.

It's going to take each of us rolling up our sleeves, getting to work, and chipping in what we can when we can.

We have our first fundraising deadline this weekend. Donate $5 or more right now to become a founding member of this organization:

https://donate.barackobama.com/First-Deadline

This is going to be fun. If we do this right, the other side won't know what hit 'em.

Messina

Jim Messina
Chair
Organizing for Action













Paid for by Organizing for Action

Contributions or gifts to Organizing for Action are not tax deductible.

               

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Political_Views" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to political_views+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

{Political_Views} Politics: Justices Seem Set to End U.S. Ban on Benefits to Gay Spouses



If you have trouble reading this e-mail, please click here
The New York Times

March 27, 2013

Politics

Outside the Supreme Court on Wednesday.

Justices Seem Set to End U.S. Ban on Benefits to Gay Spouses

By ADAM LIPTAK and PETER BAKER

Justice Anthony M. Kennedy's questions in a hearing on the Defense of Marriage Act suggested he was prepared to side with the Supreme Court's four liberal members to strike down a central provision.

Mary Bonauto argued a Defense of Marriage Act case when Justice Elena Kagan was President Obama's solicitor general.

Proponents of Gay Marriage Credit a Maine Lawyer

By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG

Mary Bonauto, of Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders, has only a sideline seat this week, but she spent a decade plotting a careful strategy.

ADVERTISEMENT

More Politics

Theodore B. Olson

Good Friends, Same Party but Legal Opponents

By SCOTT SHANE

Two conservative Republican lawyers, Theodore B. Olson and Charles J. Cooper, argued opposite sides of a historic Supreme Court case.

The Lede

Highlights From Wednesday's Hearing

By THE NEW YORK TIMES

The justices heard arguments about the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act.

A rally on Monday in Fargo, N.D., against strict abortion limits.

New Laws Ban Most Abortions in North Dakota

By JOHN ELIGON and ERIK ECKHOLM

Gov. Jack Dalrymple signed the nation's toughest abortion restrictions into law on Tuesday, including a measure that bans the procedure as soon as six weeks into a pregnancy.

Julia A. Pierson

First Woman Is Chosen to Lead Secret Service

By PETER BAKER

Julia Pierson, a longtime agent who joined the service after three years as a police officer, is taking over at a time when the agency is still recovering from a scandal.

Senator Tim Johnson at a news conference Tuesday announcing his retirement when his term ends in 2015.

South Dakota Senator Won't Run Again

By JENNIFER STEINHAUER

The decision by Tim Johnson, a Democrat, not to seek re-election opens up a potential new opportunity for Republicans in a state that President Obama lost by a large margin last year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Multimedia

Video: DOMA Case Goes Before Supreme Court

The Times's John Schwartz dissects the questions posed in the case against the Defense of Marriage Act.

Interactive Feature: Key Moments From the Hearing on Gay Marriage

Times reporters offered analysis of the hearing, with audio excerpts, over the constitutionality of Proposition 8, California's law banning same-sex marriage.

Video: Reproductive Restrictions Accelerated

Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood, reacts to new laws that nearly eradicate abortion rights in North Dakota.

Video: Justices Hear Gay Marriage Arguments

After witnessing the same-sex marriage hearings, The Times's Scott Shane assesses the questions posed by the Supreme Court justices.

ADVERTISEMENT

 

           

       


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Political_Views" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to political_views+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.